Our
Education section is an undiscovered gem. And it is
definitely not a
compilation of boring academic essays but a riveting look at the
serious
problems facing our education system. Take a moment to check it
out.
About Advertising
Click
Advertise Here for more details about our great advertising
rates.
IMPORTANT
NOTE
If running Norton Internet Security (NIS), please
temporarily disable it to enjoy the rich graphics of this
site.
Would Jesus
Drive an SUV
What Would Jesus Drive? By John D. Turner
Well, what would Jesus Drive?
Don't laugh. I was reading an article recently
that posed just this question. The article had to do with a recent
anti-SUV rally in Lynn, Massachusetts, sponsored by local
churchgoers and members of the clergy. The message was that as
stewards of the Earth, Christians should embrace the environmental
movement and that as such, should not be driving such things as
gas-guzzling SUVs.
Present were such signs as "Test drive your feet. Walk away from
SUVs", and the provocative, guilt-intending sign from an associate
minister of Hancock United Church of Christ in Lexington, Mass,
"What would Jesus Drive". Smith, a true believer when it comes to
global warming, suggested that local churches could do a lot more
than they are currently doing to address that problem. He noted that
on any given Sunday his church parking lot is full of SUVs, and sees
it as his mission to help his flock be better informed about the
consequences of their decisions "as consumers and as Christians".
It appears that in the modern age, instead of
philosophizing on how many angels can dance on the head of a pin, we
are now into more "practical" applications of philosophy, such as
what manner of vehicle Christ would drive were he carrying out his
mission today.
Whereas Smith doesn't come right out and say
what make and model Jesus would drive, he leaves little doubt that
it would be some kind of environmentally friendly vehicle, most
probably a hybrid or electric of some type. But he certainly would
not be driving one of those monster SUVs, the epitome of waste and
disregard for the environment in our country today. At least in
Smith's humble opinion.
Au contraire. It is my humble opinion (for
what its worth), that if Christ were alive today, he would drive a
15 passenger van. After all, he had all those apostles he had to
take along with him.
Lets suppose for sake of argument that,
wanting to be "environmentally conscious", Jesus were to decide to
use a compact car which gets say 36 miles to the gallon on the
highway. Most cars of this size only comfortably seat four adults.
How to pack himself and 12 apostles into a car seating four? Well,
you can't. Quite aside from seatbelt laws and safety issues, putting
more than four adults in a car this size for anything short of a
quick trip around the block would require them to be on very
friendly terms indeed. On a long trip it would be highly
uncomfortable to say the least. So in order for them all to travel
together, they would need more than one vehicle. Note that 13 does
not evenly divide by four. You would have three cars with a
remainder of one Apostle.
You could leave one at home I suppose (eleven
would probably do as well as twelve). Or possibly tie him to the
roof of one of the vehicles, or maybe shoehorn him in one regardless
of seat-belt laws. Or you could purchase a fourth car and put three
people in three of them and four in another. For sake of argument
here, lets assume that he buys three cars, one of which is actually
belted for five, like my Saturn which gets somewhat less than 36
mpg, but we will let that slide for the moment.
So now we have Christ, his twelve apostles,
and three cars, each of which gets 36 mpg. Now lets suppose that
they wish to take a trip to proselyte at a neighboring city out west
that is 360 miles round trip (like driving from San Antonio to
Houston and back). This would require an expenditure of 10 gallons
of fuel per vehicle, or 30 gallons total. Now suppose that instead
they took a 15-passenger van.
A 15-passenger van gets about 18 mpg. The same
trip would consume only 20 gallons of gas for this "monster SUV".
And, as an added benefit, Christ and the apostles could discuss
points of doctrine, sing hymns and fellowship together on the way.
Not to mention the other environmentally friendly aspects of the
15-passenger van vice the three "energy efficient" compact cars; 4
tires vs. 12 tires, 1 battery vs. 3 batteries, etc. And let's not
forget the initial cost of purchasing three cars vice one van. The
van is certainly the way to go.
I suppose that Christ and the apostles could
have taken a train or a bus, but the question was "what would Christ
drive", not "how would Christ get there".
I have a similar "problem" in my family. We
don't all fit into my Saturn, which is only belted for five. To
solve this problem, we have one of those "monster SUVs"; a Suburban.
Why not buy a minivan instead, you ask? Well, minivans are belted
for seven, and there are eight of us. Suburbans are belted for eight
and have sufficient cargo space so that we can take more than a
toothbrush and set of underwear with us when we go on a trip. Ergo,
we have a Suburban (although we are considering trading it for a
15-passenger van, which gets about the same gas mileage).
We could, I suppose, have purchased two
Saturns instead. Our Suburban gets around 16 mpg. The Saturn gets 30
(33 if I don't run the AC). So gas-wise, it is pretty much a wash if
I want to move the entire family somewhere, like to church on Sunday
morning. Of course there is still the issue of eight tires vice
four, and two batteries vice one. And also that we can't be a family
as easily in two separate vehicles as we can in one. So while we
could use two, more efficient vehicles instead of the one SUV, it
really doesn't make much sense to do so, from any perspective.
It annoys me greatly when people have the
audacity to tell me what I "need" or "don't need" based on their
preconceptions, without any knowledge of or regard for my personal
circumstances. And it really irks me when people ring in their
opinion of "what Jesus would do" to attempt to "guilt trip" me into
following their agenda.
The fact of the matter is that we can opine
from now until the second coming what Jesus might or might not do on
a whole host of subjects, but in fact, we really can't speculate
with any degree of accuracy as to what sort of vehicle he would
drive were he to suddenly appear here today. And for a preacher to
use his or her opinion of what Jesus might or might not do to brow
beat their congregation into following their own personal agenda is
at the very least, disingenuous, if not outright blasphemous, and
certainly an exercise of unrighteous dominion.
In my humble opinion, of course.
We want your opinion! Tell us what you thought about
this article. Click the
Your Feedback menu item to send us
your comments.
COMMENTS FROM READERS
A reader, "Anne" wrote: "It's the folks (or
folk) in the Suburban we're all wondering about. "
Well, Anne - wonder about yourself, not me. You may see me -
ALONE in
my Ford Expedition. But what you will NOT see is the number of
days I opt to work from a home office to SAVE gas, so I can
still drive the vehicle of my choice, which is handy for hauling
necessities and family on the weekend, if required.
You may see my husband in his Chevy 3500. Sometimes you will see
us
hauling a 38 foot RV. You won't see us in an airplane, but you
will see us enjoying the nature which WE try to protect.
So - to all the green folks...as the saying goes...'judge not,
lest ye be judged' -Jan
The only thing that I know of that Jesus
actually drove was the money changers from the Temple-- with a
whip.
-Mark
Obviously, when we goofy, green, wanting to
breathe air we can't see or smell, Republicans, (YES, there are
still a few of us left in this party of flatliners) say
people/families should drive something smaller, we ARE referring
to a SMALL family...
It's the folks (or folk) in the Suburban we're all wondering
about. During WW II it was patriotic to ration our gas. Today,
during this was for oil, it would appear to be the opposite...
hmmmmm
Glad to hear you have BOTH a Saturn and the Suburban in the
garage. One would hope you wouldn't drive the gas hog as a daily
commuter with one person inside... -Anne
Hooray for common sense! It isn't always good
to use the smallest vehicle nor does it make sense to use a dump
truck to drive myself to work every morning.
Well I guess the point I'm trying to make is that you have to do
what you think is the most moral and least wasteful decision
that you can live with. If I went to logical extremes I could
get many possible ideas.
Extreme environmentalist ideas:
1) Only walk and forbid ALL
engines electric or not for anything but mass transit and
postage. We all know that walking is good for you, and if it's
good for you then it must be good to make it a law!
2) Make it mandatory to have foot powered generators in all
living rooms and make the TV's power have a 'matching fund' of
electricity maxed out at some multiple of your workout's power (hehe
funny one really). I keep laughing at the image.
3) Pay someone else to 'volunteer' to do the driving for you so
you can claim lack of guilt - like how people won't kill an
animal but love their cheeseburgers (a.k.a. hypocrites!). Some
of them even don't mind killing people to stop animals from
being researched upon.
You think that's bad?
Extremist business
ideas:
1) Being healthy is UnAmeriCan with an UAC in it. This means you
must eat the most fattening foods possible, never walk, and
never, never, ever let someone tell you that cigarettes give you
cancer - they're red anyway so who cares what those fools say!
2) Walking is bad for the US economy - imagine all those people
selling gasoline losing their gas stations and refineries. They
provide tons of jobs for everyone! Not to mention that if the
demand for oil disappeared overnight that in the Middle East
many industrial nations would collapse overnight into
revolutions in the street - they’d not be able to use their own
oil to improve their economy right?
3) Hydrogen-powered cars will NOT get their fuel from electric
power plants running on coal. That's just anti-technology
nonsense rumors. Oh no, this baby will use PLUTONIUM which is
the cleanest fuel known to man. No smog, no annoying CO2, no
annoying NO2, and most of all it's recyclable into many other
useful products!
Hope you enjoyed my humor even if it insults 90% of everyone.
I thought the foot powered generator was a classic goldbergian
idea but I bet you can beat me with a better one!
I didn't add religious right or libertarians or communists but
you probably know a few. Or even better: make fun of fence
sitters and sycophants who try hard to never say anything or to
ever offend someone since of course offended people vote the
other way or at least not for you. -Joseph
Any opinions or views
expressed herein belong solely to the author and does not represent
any employer, organization, political party, governmental agency, or
any other entity and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
site owner or its participants.
Premium Ad
Announcements
Our
Miscellaneous section is our feature that covers offbeat
stories as well as our personal musings on just about anything.
Take a five minute break and check it out.