Our
Education section is an undiscovered gem. And it is
definitely not a
compilation of boring academic essays but a riveting look at the
serious
problems facing our education system. Take a moment to check it
out.
About Advertising
Click
Advertise Here for more details about our great advertising
rates.
IMPORTANT
NOTE
If running Norton Internet Security (NIS), please
temporarily disable it to enjoy the rich graphics of this
site.
Driving
Drunk Again
Repeat Offenders Back on the Streets
By Daniel Muniz
Drunk drivers who are repeat offenders driving on our streets is
often a common staple of local media reports. It is outrageous to
discover that such serious repeat offenders do not really spend very
much time in jail unless they kill someone. And even when their
driver’s licenses are revoked, they still manage to end up back
behind the wheel.
Although there may be sympathy for someone arrested once or twice
while driving under the influence, for the most part, many people
would like judges to throw the book at chronic repeat offenders,
especially before they end up killing innocent bystanders during one
of their drunken stupors. And now in many local municipalities
across the country, quite a number of repeat offenders do receive
harsh sentences.
But then how do these dangerous drunks get back on the road again?
And even worse, how do they manage to walk out of a jail after
spending a brief amount of time even though a judge has thrown the
book at them?
As for getting out of jail, the answer lies in practicality and
economics.
In the county I live in, a local judge once explained that even if a
repeat offender is sent to one year jail term, he will more than
likely be out within a few months. Due to massive jail overcrowding,
it is fairly easy for a habitual drunk driver to be labeled as a
non-violent offender, thus enabling him to serve only a fraction of
his sentence.
Compared to the thugs who are murderers, rapists, armed robbers, or
violent hoodlums, it becomes a no-brainer to the prison staff on who
is going to get released early. This pragmatic view of logistics may
suffice for keeping violent criminals locked up but this
permissiveness and leniency doesn’t solve society’s problem of the
habitual drunk driver getting back on the streets to once again pose
a dangerous risk to the rest of us.
As for getting back behind the wheel, it is not too difficult for a
repeat offender to find someone to loan him a car.
Consequently, short jail time and the accessibility to vehicles is
just a recipe for future disasters.
Due to the way our prison system is set up, long sentences are not
an effective. Personally, I am a “lock them up, throw away the key”
type of person but I also understand the sober reality of prison
overcrowding. For decades, activist groups have made prisons so
outrageously expensive that it has become cost prohibitive to lock
someone away for an extended amount of time unless he or she is
truly a violent criminal.
My home state of Texas has taken aggressive steps in locking up
first time offenders for seventy hours.
The hope is that in making the seventy hours a requirement for the
first offense, that such a penalty will be enough to scare away most
people from doing that again. Consequently, the majority who are
responsible enough, the 72 hour rule does the job that is it is
supposed to do, especially since most people want to keep their jobs
and maintain their family and freedoms. But again, the specter of
overcrowding takes precedence. It’s a great law but it is only as
strong as its enforcement and execution.
As for dealing with chronic drunks who manage to get behind the
wheel again, then perhaps the most interesting idea I have seen
focuses on the second most important target which is the car he or
she is driving. Whoever gets busted while driving under the
influence, then that car gets impounded for 30 days regardless of
ownership.
All of a sudden, the generosity of someone loaning out a car now has
severe and far reaching repercussions. Naturally, such an initiative
won’t completely stop this problem but it will have a dramatic
effect in which many people won’t want to take a chance of losing a
car for a month, thus they will feel less inclined to loan it out
even for a short trip.
And such a deterrent is effective across the board.
It deters the potential first or second time offenders because
losing a car for 30 days may be far more painful than spending 72
hours in jail. It is also a big deterrent to anyone loaning out
their car to a habitual drunk driver.
Of course there is another more obvious solution that is rarely
addressed.
States and big metropolitan areas need to fund and construct low
cost “non-violent” jails. Like something reminiscent of the tent
cities of the Maricopa County jails in Arizona. Such extreme and
Spartan measures are harsh but they can also be maintained at a low
cost while housing large numbers of inmates.
It is just too expensive to keep someone who isn’t a hardened
criminal incarcerated or to have them placed in the resort-style
cupcake jails. The tent cities solve that problem. Such offenders
are already a low risk and most just want to get out of jail. They
do not warrant the same kind of risk of flight as the vicious
convicts do.
The violent thugs need to be locked away for a long time but so do
certain types of non-violent offenders.
Not with just drunk drivers, but there are plenty of misdemeanor
crimes in which people walk away with nothing more than a slap on
the wrist. The way to adequately address the severity of those
crimes even though they are not felonies is to ensure that they are
locked up for the entire lengths of their sentences.
But again, that is an issue that will rarely be debated until such
crimes soar completely out of control.
As for the habitual drunk drivers, it is time for cities to come to
grips with the cracks in the system that allow them to flagrantly
flout the law.
We want your opinion! Tell us what you thought about
this article. Click the
Your Feedback menu item to send us
your comments.
Any opinions or views
expressed herein belong solely to the author and does not represent
any employer, organization, political party, governmental agency, or
any other entity and do not necessarily reflect the views of the
site owner or its participants.
Premium Ad
Announcements
Our
Miscellaneous section is our feature that covers offbeat
stories as well as our personal musings on just about anything.
Take a five minute break and check it out.